VISIT OF THE HOLY FATHER TO BARI FOR THE MEETING OF REFLECTION AND SPIRITUALITY, “MEDITERRANEAN: FRONTIER OF PEACE” MEETING WITH BISHOPS OF THE MEDITERRANEAN ADDRESS OF HIS HOLINESS

Dear Brothers,
I am pleased that we can meet you and I am grateful that each of you has
accepted the invitation of the Italian Episcopal Conference to take part in this
meeting, which assembles the Churches of the Mediterranean. In looking around
this Church [the Basilica of St. Nicholas, I think of another meeting, our meeting
with the Heads of the Christian Churches, both Orthodox and Catholic, here in
Bari. This is the second time in a few months that we have made a gesture of
unity of this kind. That earlier meeting was the first time after the great schism
that all of us were together, and this is the first meeting of bishops from around
the Mediterranean. I think we could call Bari the capital of unity, of the unity of
the Church – if Archbishop Cacucci will let us! Thank you for your welcome,
Excellency, thank you.
When Cardinal Bassetti presented the idea to me, I readily accepted it, seeing it
as an opportunity to begin a process of listening and discussion aimed at helping
to build peace in this crucial part of the world. For that reason, I wanted to be
present and testify to the importance of the new model of fraternity and
collegiality that you represent. I like the word that you joined to dialogue:
conviviality.
I find it significant that this meeting takes place in Bari, since this city is so
important for its links with the Middle East and Africa; it is an eloquent sign of
the deeply rooted relationships between different peoples and traditions. The
Diocese of Bari has always fostered ecumenical and interreligious dialogue,
working tirelessly to create bonds of mutual esteem and fraternity. I purposely
chose Bari a year and a half ago, as I said, to meet leaders of Christian
communities in the Middle East for an important moment of discussion and
fellowship meant to help our sister Churches to journey together and feel closer
to one another.
You have come together in this particular context to reflect on the vocation and
future of the Mediterranean, on the transmission of the faith and the promotion
of peace. The Mare nostrum is the physical and spiritual locus where our
civilization took shape as a result of the encounter of diverse peoples. By its very
configuration, this sea forces surrounding peoples and cultures to constant
interact, to recall what they have in common, and to realize that only by living in
concord can they enjoy the opportunities this region offers, thanks to its
resources, its natural beauty and its varied human traditions.
In our own day, the importance of this area has not decreased in the wake of the
process of globalization; on the contrary, globalization has highlighted the role of
the Mediterranean as a crossroads of interests and important social, political,
religious and economic currents. The Mediterranean remains a strategic region
whose equilibrium has an impact on the other parts of the world.
It could be said that the size of the Mediterranean is inversely proportional to its
importance, to see it more as a lake than an ocean, as Giorgio La Pira once said.
Defining it as “the great Sea of Galilee”, he drew an analogy between Jesus’ time
and our own, between his milieu and that of the peoples of our time. Just as
Jesus lived and worked in a context of differing cultures and beliefs, so we find
ourselves in a multifaceted environment scarred by divisions and forms of
inequality that lead to instability. Amid deep fault lines and economic, religious,
confessional and political conflicts, we are called to offer our witness to unity and
peace. We do so prompted by our faith and membership in the Church, seeking
to understand the contribution that we, as disciples of the Lord, can make to all
the men and women of the Mediterranean region.
The transmission of the faith necessarily draws upon the heritage of the
Mediterranean region. That heritage has been fostered, preserved and kept alive
by Christian communities through catechesis and the celebration of the
sacraments, the formation of consciences, and individual and communal hearing
of the Lord’s word. Specifically, thanks to popular piety, the Christian experience
has taken on a form both meaningful and enduring: popular devotion is for the
most part the expression of straightforward and authentic faith. Here I often like
to cite that gem which is No. 48 of the Exhortation Evangelii Nuntiandi on
popular piety, where Saint Paul VI prefers, in place of “religiosity”, to speak of
“popular piety”, pointing out both its richness and its shortcomings. That
passage should guide us in our proclamation of the Gospel to the peoples.
In this region, one deposit of remarkable potential is its art, which combines the
content of the faith with cultural treasures and beautiful artworks. This heritage
continues to attract millions of visitors from every part of the world and must be
carefully preserved as a precious legacy received “on loan”, to be handed on to
future generations.
In the light of all this, the preaching of the Gospel cannot be detached from
commitment to the common good; it impels us to act tirelessly as peacemakers.
The Mediterranean region is currently threatened by outbreaks of instability and
conflict, both in the Middle East and different countries of North Africa, as well as
between various ethnic, religious or confessional groups. Nor can we overlook
the still unresolved conflict between Israelis and Palestinians, with the danger of
inequitable solutions and, hence, a prelude to new crises.
War, by allocating resources to the acquisition of weapons and military power,
diverts those resources from vital social needs, such as the support of families,
health care and education. As Saint John XXIII teaches, it is contrary to reason
(cf. Pacem in Terris, 114; 127). In other words, it is madness; it is madness to
destroy houses, bridges, factories and hospitals, to kill people and annihilate
resources, instead of building human and economic relationships. It is a kind of
folly to which we cannot resign ourselves: war can never be considered normal,
or accepted as an inevitable means of settling differences and conflicts of
interest. Never.
The ultimate goal of every human society is peace; indeed, we can affirm once
more that “in spite of everything, there is no real alternative to peacemaking”
(Meeting with Heads of Churches and Christian Communities in the Middle East,
Bari, 7 July 2018). There is no reasonable alternative to peace, because every
attempt at exploitation or supremacy demeans both its author and its target. It
shows a myopic grasp of reality, since it can offer no future to either of the two.
War is thus the failure of every plan, human and divine. One need only visit a
countryside or city that has been a theatre of war to realize how, as a result of
hatred, a garden turns into a desolate and inhospitable landscape, how the
earthly paradise turns into hell. Here I would also mention the grave sin of
hypocrisy, when at international meetings many countries talk about peace and
then sell weapons to countries at war. This can be called hypocrisy on a grand
scale.
Peace, which the Church and every civic institution must always consider their
first priority, has justice as its indispensable condition. Justice is trampled
underfoot when the needs of individuals are ignored and where partisan
economic interests prevail over the rights of individuals and communities.
Moreover, justice is blocked by a throwaway culture that treats persons as if they
were things, generating and promoting inequality. So much so that on the shores
of this very sea there are some societies of immense wealth and others in which
many people struggle simply to survive.
A decisive contribution to combating this culture is made by the countless
charitable and educational works carried out by Christian communities.
Whenever dioceses, parishes, associations, volunteer organizations – one of the
great treasures of Italian pastoral care – or individuals strive to support those
abandoned or in need, the Gospel becomes all the more powerful and attractive.
In the pursuit of the common good – another name for peace – we should
employ the criterion pointed out by La Pira: to let ourselves be guided by the
“expectations of the poor” (“Le attese della povera gente”, in Cronache sociali
1/1950). This principle, which can never be set aside for calculation or
convenience, if taken seriously, enables a radical anthropological shift that
makes everyone more human.
What use is a society of constant technological progress, if it becomes
increasingly indifferent to its members in need? In preaching the Gospel, we
hand on a way of thinking that respects each person by our unremitting effort to
make the Church, the Churches, a sign of special care for the vulnerable and the
poor. For “the parts of the body which seem to be weaker are indispensable” (1
Cor 12:22) and “if one member suffers, all suffer together” (1 Cor 12:26).
In the Mediterranean region, these include all who are fleeing war or who have
left their homelands in search of a humanly dignified life. The number of these
brothers and sisters – forced to abandon their loved ones and their lands, and to
face conditions of extreme insecurity – has risen as a result of spreading
conflicts and increasingly dramatic environmental and climatic conditions. It is
easy to anticipate that this phenomenon, with its momentous developments, will
have an effect on the Mediterranean, for which states and religious communities
must not be found unprepared. While countries experiencing this flow of
migrants and countries to which they travel are affected by this, so too are the
governments and Churches of the migrants’ countries of origin, which, with the
departure of so many young people, witness the impoverishment of their own
future.
We are aware that, in different social contexts, there is a growing attitude of
indifference and even rejection that reflects the mentality, condemned in many
of the Gospel parables, of those who, caught up in their own wealth and
freedom, are blind to others who, by speaking out or by the very fact of their
poverty, are pleading for help. Fear is leading to a sense that we need to defend
ourselves against what is depicted in demagogic terms as an invasion. The
rhetoric of the clash of civilizations merely serves to justify violence and to
nurture hatred. The failure or, in any case, the weakness of politics, and
factionalism are leading to forms of radicalism and terrorism. The international
community has been content with military interventions, whereas it should have
built institutions that can guarantee equal opportunities and enable citizens to
assume their responsibility for the common good.
For our part, brothers, let us speak out to demand that government leaders
protect minorities and religious freedom. The persecution experienced above all
– but not only – by Christian communities is a heart-rending fact that cannot
leave us indifferent.
In the meantime, we can never resign ourselves to the fact that someone who
seeks hope by way of the sea can die without receiving help, or that someone
from afar can fall prey to sexual exploitation, be underpaid or recruited by
gangs.
To be sure, acceptance and a dignified integration are stages in a process that is
not easy. Yet it is unthinkable that we can address the problem by putting up
walls. I grow fearful when I hear certain speeches by some leaders of the new
forms of populism; it reminds me of speeches that disseminated fear and hatred
back in the thirties of the last century. As I said, it is unthinkable that this
process of acceptance and dignified integration can be accomplished by building
walls. When we do so, we cut ourselves off from the richness brought by others,
which always represents an opportunity for growth. When we reject the desire
for fellowship present deep within the human heart and is part of the history of
peoples, we stand in the way of the unification of the human family, which
despite many challenges, continues to advance. Last week, an artist from Turin
sent me a little wood-burned picture of the flight to Egypt with Saint Joseph, not
the peaceful Saint Joseph we are used to seeing on holy cards, but Saint Joseph
in the guise of a Syrian refugee bearing a child on his shoulders. It portrayed the
pain and the bitter tragedy of the Child Jesus on the flight to Egypt. The same
thing that is happening today.
The Mediterranean has a unique vocation in this regard: it is the sea of
intermingling, “culturally always open to encounter, dialogue and mutual
inculturation” (Meeting with Heads of Churches and Christian Communities in the
Middle East, Bari, 7 July 2018). Notions of racial purity have no future. The
message of intermingling has much to tell us. To be part of the Mediterranean
region is a source extraordinary potential: may we not allow a spirit of
nationalism to spread the opposite view, namely, that those states less
accessible and geographically more isolated should be privileged. Dialogue alone
enables us to come together, to overcome prejudices and stereotypes, to tell our
stories and to come to know ourselves better. Dialogue is the word I heard
today: conviviality.
Young people, too, represent a special opportunity. When they are provided the
resources and possibilities they need to take charge of their own future, they
show that they are capable of generating a promising and hope-filled future. This
will only happen as the result of an acceptance that is not superficial but
heartfelt and benevolent, practised by everyone at all levels, both the everyday
level of interpersonal relationships and the political and institutional levels, and
fostered by those who shape culture and bear greater responsibility in the area
of public opinion.
For those who believe in the Gospel, dialogue is advantageous not only from an
anthropological but also from a theological standpoint. Listening to our brothers
and sisters is not only an act of charity but also a way of listening to the Spirit of
God who surely works in others and whose voice transcends the limits in which
we are often tempted to constrain the truth. Let us come to know the value of
hospitality: “for thereby some have entertained angels unawares” (Heb 13:1).
We need to develop a theology of acceptance and of dialogue leading to a
renewed understanding and proclamation of the teaching of Scripture. This can
only happen if we make every effort to take the first step and not exclude the
seeds of truth also possessed by others. In this way, the discussion of our
various religious convictions can concern not only the truths we believe, but also
specific themes that can become defining points of our teaching as a whole.
All too often, history has known conflicts and struggles based on the distorted
notion that we are defending God by opposing anyone who does not share our
set of beliefs. Indeed, extremism and fundamentalism deny the dignity of the
human person and his or her religious freedom, and thus lead to moral decline
and the spread of an antagonistic view of human relationships. This too shows
us the urgent need of a more vital encounter between different religious
confessions, one motivated by sincere respect and a desire for peace.
This encounter is spurred by the awareness, set forth in the Document on
Human Fraternity signed at Abu Dhabi, that “the authentic teachings of religions
invite us to remain rooted in the values of peace; to defend the values of mutual
understanding, human fraternity and harmonious coexistence”. Religious groups
and different communities can cooperate more actively in helping the poor and
welcoming immigrants, in such a way that our relationships are motivated by
common goals and accompanied by active commitment. Those who together
dirty their hands in building peace and fraternal acceptance will no longer be
able to fight over matters of faith, but will pursue the paths of respectful
discussion, mutual solidarity, and the quest for unity. Its opposite is what I felt
when I went to Lampedusa, that air of indifference: on the island there was
acceptance and welcome, but then, in the world, the culture of indifference.
Dear brothers, these are the hopes I wanted to share with you at the conclusion
of our fruitful and consoling encounter in these days. I entrust you to the
intercession of the Apostle Paul who was the first to cross the Mediterranean,
facing dangers and hardships of every kind, in order to bring the Gospel of Christ
to everyone. May his example show you the paths to pursue in the joyful and
liberating task of handing on the faith in our own time.
I leave you with the words of the Prophet Isaiah, in the hope that they will
provide you and your respective communities with hope and strength.
Witnessing the destruction of Jerusalem after the exile, the prophet did not fail
to look forward to a future of peace and prosperity: “They shall build up the
ancient ruins, they shall raise up the former devastations; they shall repair the
ruined cities, the devastations of many generations” (Is 61:4). This is the work
the Lord entrusts to you on behalf of this beloved Mediterranean region: to
restore relationships that have been broken, to rebuild cities destroyed by
violence, to make a garden flourish in what is now a desert, to instil hope in the
hopeless, and to encourage those caught up in themselves not to fear their
brothers or sisters. And to look upon this [sea], which has already become a
cemetery, as a place of future resurrection for the entire area. May the Lord
accompany your steps and bless your work of reconciliation and peace. Thank
you.